Smaller Indiana

Making people and ideas findable

I was recently asked to weigh in on the topic of "women having it all."

What, of course, is triggering the increased interest we're seeing on the topic of "work-life balance" (don't get me started) is Sarah Palin's entry into the political race and her purposeful political branding as a "hockey mom" with five kidlings, a hubster and a full-time job.

I have to admit: I had to corral my gag reflex.

I'm often asked, as a speaker, to address this issue. So here's a little of the less "cleaned-up" version of my thinking on the topic.

We are--men and women both--on a treadmill in the workplace, trying to jam more into the average day than our forebears crammed into the average week. We’re information glutted with more raw data in the Sunday New York Times than was accessible in the entire lifetime of a person living just a hundred years ago. On the home front, the advances in technology that were supposed to shave significant time off our weekly chores have us now doing more housework than our great (and sometimes great-great) grandmothers. Voicemail, PDA’s, email and the like have allows work to leave a greater and greater footprint on our personal time.

And things--important things--are dropping out.

I heard from one friend--a man with a demanding job (really, a job he allowed to become demanding) answered his email on his PDA that one last time and his lady love...a truly spectacular and gentle human being, spiked the offending tech. Two points! She'd had enough of being a WINO ("wife in name only"). He was Missing in Action.

How We Got Here
In the late 18th and throughout the 19th, the aim of industrialization was to shift the largely agrarian workforce into wage laborers. Expanding on the need to produce which stemmed, in part from the Protestant work ethic (combined with the notion of Salvation by Works), this great project combined fear of God with fear of want. Wages were kept purposely low to ensure that workers returned the next day.

A class of Willing Slaves was created.

During the next several decades, workers began to revolt over long hours, dangerous working conditions and child labor. Days shrank to 10 hours and then 8, children as young as six were prohibited from work, locked doors (to prevent those slacking workers from hieing-off) were unlocked. Trade unions were formed to negotiate for better pay, benefits and working conditions and employment laws were passed to eliminate—at least in the sphere of public policy—the codified ill-treatment of workers. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, a non-agrarian, family was able to live relatively well on one salary and it became easier to acquire a house and car. These children of the Traditionalists (people born between 1925 and 1945) were the leading edge of the working Baby Boomers and, because of the post-war boom, were in high demand.

Fast forward to the 1970’s and it starts getting very unpleasant. Inflation mushroomed, gas prices exploded and so did the work week. Between 1977 and 1997, the workweek expanded by over 8% (43.6 hours to 47.1 hours a week on average). A 70 hour work week became de rigueur.

At the same time, anti-discrimination laws began to address gender and pregnancy discrimination. Good thing. Because of inflation, the single worker salary was just not enough to cover expenses or sock away a little extra for education or retirement. In the mid-1980’s the term “work-life balance” emerged to describe the separation (or lack thereof) between work and home. This generation was dubbed the “Me Generation,” called “yuppies” or “yummies” (young, upwardly mobile professionals), “buppies” (Black upwardly-mobile professionals), or members of the “Age of Isolation.” Latchkey and shuttle cock kids were found to have increased attention deficits (over-stimulated and exhausted) and poorer diets. Our kids are getting fatter and (can I say it plainly) dumber.

And a new industry was born.

What concerns me in the discussion of work-life balance is that there seems to be little concern with whether the work we’re trying to balance is important. Sure, moving things from one side of the desk to the other in a particular workday and schlepping the kidlets to soccer/swim/tap/tai-kwon-jitsu seems laudable, but it that what’s really important? Oh, yeah, and can we make all of that work without factoring out personal happiness and satisfaction.

Talking with a group of women, I heard many explain that they had to sacrifice for their children. Why then, I asked, was it only women that are heard having that conversation? There are a few home truths to consider here:

  • Can women continue to do it all? Honestly, no. Our personal Kryptonite? "Bad mother/Bad housekeeper/Bad cook/Bad (fill in the blank)"—these words can stop a powerful woman at 50 yards. Rather than determining whether we’re doing the right things, we go like little "doing bots," hauling kids on endless expeditions to every social, sporting and school event imaginable; being the first one called when a younger (or elder) family member hits the skids; doing all the laundry/shopping/cooking/planning...and trying to do it all perfectly (if we don't just give up in despair).
  • While in doing-bot mode, we inadvertently (and almost unconsciously) teach our daughters that a woman's life is sacrifice and suffering. Just recently, a 14 year-old girl I met, in discussing harried her mother, vowed “I’ll never have children.”
  • Can men still have it all without women to take up most of the slack? I don't think so. Sad truth on this one...we, as women (the first educators of children) teach future generations of men what to expect from the women in their lives and teach future generations of women how to be those women...such that those expectations fall beneath their—and our—notice (like the air and the grass). If I had a buck for every woman I’ve ever heard who said “I wish I had a wife,” I could buy a Starbucks!
  • At the same time, I'd like to recognize what a treadmill it can be for men who would rather gnaw off a limb than not "provide for the family"--how that can drive them into being little "doing bots" in their own right.

What Does it Take to Have it All “Having it all,” as defined by others, takes a whole lot of support.
What I don’t think we’re focusing on is whether people are doing work that matters or that’s workable. As the workday gets filled with ass-covering email tracking, cryptic voicemail deciphering, endless meetings (to “report in” to micromanaging bosses who are poorly deployed), we find ourselves doing less “real work”—work that fulfills strategic intentions and desired outcomes.

When asked “can you really get your two kids to all those events,” I’ve never heard a woman who has been able to say a clean “no—it’s not feasible” or ‘no, that’s too much for a school night” even though that’s their persistent complaint.

Leaders must be selected, placed and trained to better plan, support and counsel, becoming champions of their workers, committed to blasting barriers and garnering needed resources. They must be challenged to be better workload planners, using their prowess to determine how to best use people to fulfill on business strategy—rather than becoming experts at moving piles around. At the same time, in our families, we have to be more focused in the “bigger game” managing our overarching aims: a happy, satisfying family life; personal satisfaction and personal growth and health, well-developed children who can function well in society without becoming time, energy or emotional vampires.

Crossposted at Like Nobody's Business

Share 

Comment

You need to be a member of Smaller Indiana to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

Toni Deckers Comment by Toni Deckers on September 21, 2008 at 9:12am
I have a friend who once said, "You can have it all, just not all at once."
Douglas Karr Comment by Douglas Karr on September 18, 2008 at 6:17pm
Lalita,

As a single Dad who is climbing up the ladder of success, each step makes me wonder if my success is actually trampling the happiness of my children and the cohesiveness of my family unit. We've not actually gone grocery shopping in months, there simply isn't time. The demands of work and a blossoming side career are huge. I feel as though I have the momentum and if I do anything to stop that momentum all will be lost. That's a tough spot to be in!

Willing slave is an amazing term and I absolutely couldn't agree more. Perhaps a synonymous term is "Salaried Exempt Employee". That classification is growing at a wicked rate in this country - surpassing all of those rights that folks worked so hard to attain for us.

Great post - although I do take exception with the Palin gag. I think she's a sincere leader with solid convictions. Even if you disagree with her, I believe she demands our respect for moving from the PTA to the VP candidate.

Doug
Dave Gibbs Comment by Dave Gibbs on September 18, 2008 at 11:05am
You are right - one cannot really have it all. That is a marketing pipedream that drives people to buys things they don't need and get involved with things they don't really want.

A few notes:
Industrialization started primarily in the UK, then Europe, and then strongly transitioned in the US during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Industrialization was not a force of history, but a very complex development in a world that was being challenged by progressive notions of development (progressive here does not hold to a political meaning, but the hunger of production to meet international goals from a broad spectrum of reasons).

Salvation by works is contrary to the basic tenants of Protestantism; which, also, developed a very high view of labor and common life activities.

The reality of wages and the dynamics of labor in traditional life and mass immigration is quite a complex one. The country was still very agricultural until World War II, which caused great changes in daily living, in the aftermath.

I disagree that US history is merely one long litany of ill treatment, but in our freedom and as traditional life became deconstructed the opportunity to take advantage of people in the labor force increased (though that problem had always been there). Life could be very hard back then and many urban labor conflicts ended with fighting in the streets, especially when labor turned from the natural ebb and flow of agricultural life to the demand for production in urbanized industry.

Actually, the 70s was a two-sided animal, while it was the decade of revolutionary change in the country. It was also the decade of the country's highest overall standard of living. That changed by the late-70s.

We do need business and we do need stuff to support our daily life; but, today, we have a problem with the growing cost of living over taking the cost of wages and the mad commitment to things that more and more people are forced to work all day in a way different from the reasons that brought about an eight hour work day.

Work is a part of our lives. In the agricultural days, labor flowed with day to day life commitments. For the most part, men and women did not sit around and whinge about who did what...they had to work hard just to get on in daily life.

Your comment “emotional vampires” is how a self-centered society views others, like Jean Paul Sartre’s “Nausea”.

What is central is finding out who we are (being), then all else follows. Even so, there will still be the challenges of daily life.
Hazel "The Queen" Walker Comment by Hazel "The Queen" Walker on September 17, 2008 at 8:17pm
I believe it is our lack of values, that drives us to want more stuff. Having stuff fills the void that a lack of values leaves. We talk about values, like integrity, family, contribution, love, and honesty but we tie those values to money, to having it all.

As for work life balance.......there is no such thing, there is work life harmony, but not balance. I once asked a friend of mine how he managed to balance a very successful marriage, children, writing, multiple businesses and a heavy speaking/traveling schedule and he said, "I am 100% present wherever I am and whatever I am doing. I do not seek balance only harmony, and harmony comes with presence, multi tasking is the death of harmony."
Sarah Brown Comment by Sarah Brown on September 17, 2008 at 7:53pm
I have seven children, I always wanted to have a large family. I didn't want a job or career, but I did want to be a woman of influence, inspiration and blessing- to my family first.
This summer the family car didn't work, so we were stuck at home for two months, my life became very localized in the small town of Fortville. I got to know people in my town, with the internet I have had time to get back to writing for the local paper (with Eric D.) I teach my own kids, fight for my family's rights in Town Hall, and milk goats. I feel like I do have everything I need and all I could want, thanks to God, and my husband who supports our family. I am thankful that we own our own business and have freedom to live and work as a family. We are blessed. Maybe when I'm older I'll run for office, I’m thinking of writing a book, but for now I need to be an influence from home, where I can tend my family first. With a great support system, called family, I will reach out even more from my home- but not for a career, I'm happy to leave that role to my husband. That's where life has us, and I am here because this lifestyle was my goal from the time I was 17- when I was graduating from homeschooling, writing for the local news paper, and looking forward to being a wife and mom.
There are many ways to live life, but our goals, faith, priorities, and choices have a lot to do with the joy we will find in life, and the influence we will have on others. My life is not “easy”, and with this pile of laundry I can hardly find the backdoor some days, but I feel so blessed to have found a place of balance and peace in a stormy stressed out world.
Sarah P. does well because her family is a great team, I think you can’t look at this woman as an individual trying to have it all, you have to see the family as that team. I also don’t see Sarah as a woman that “has” it all, I see her as one who “gives” it all, she must be exhausted at the end of the day!
Erik Deckers Comment by Erik Deckers on September 17, 2008 at 4:19pm
I think the problem is that we as a society put an emphasis on having it all, when we should focus on having enough. My wife and I have adopted this attitude. Sure, we could have a huge income and a big house and do all the things the other well-off McMansion dwellers do, but then we wouldn't be able to enjoy the things we're supposedly striving toward -- more money for more time together to do more things. But our kids would be in public school, not homeschool. There would be after-school daycare, and racing around like mad to get to every extracurricular event under the sun.

Instead, we focus on more time together and doing more stuff together, but without killing ourselves to make more and more money. Since our emphasis is on time together and creating memories, we don't worry about whether that time is at a local event compared to Disney World in the middle of summer. Our kids will remember that we did stuff together, not that my wife and I were always working, except for that really hot, grouchy week in Orlando.
Mike Seidle Comment by Mike Seidle on September 17, 2008 at 10:52am
What you do with your life is your choice. If you want success, power, wealth, fame or simply people in your life that love you, you make decisions with the one thing that you really have: time. Want wealth? Work on making money. Want power? Get ready for spending 1000's of hours on the campaign trail. Want real love in your life? Get read to invest 1000's of hours in your personal life, and probably at the expense of your life at work. Today is not really all that different in the past in that respect. What is different is that we have technology that lets me spend time at home while negotiating a contract, or turns a drive in the car into something productive.

It's all about how you choose to live. If you feel society or "the times" make you too busy to be happy, that is your choice. After all, you can do like the main character in Office Space and just say "I'm not going to do that any more." That's called freedom, and we still have it in America.

Forum

Michael J Dukehart, II

Whole Beef Tenderloin deals?

Started by Michael J Dukehart, II in Questions and Answers 1 hour ago.

Elizabeth Audet

Free Nutcracker Tickets from IBC 3 Replies

Started by Elizabeth Audet in Events for the creative class. Last reply by Elizabeth Audet 12 hours ago.

Annie Sever-Dimitri

Boobs-N-Business 106 Replies

Started by Annie Sever-Dimitri in Questions and Answers. Last reply by Ted Myers 13 hours ago.

Steph Woodward

What to Put in a Portfolio? 1 Reply

Started by Steph Woodward in Questions and Answers. Last reply by PK Koduri 14 hours ago.

Justin Brady

Holiday festive fun in Indy 6 Replies

Started by Justin Brady in Non Profit: events, news, ideas. Last reply by Tracey Rollison 14 hours ago.

Pat Coyle

So Google has real time results. Does this really change everything? 2 Replies

Started by Pat Coyle in Technology. Last reply by Sara Croft 17 hours ago.

Carl Vigliarolo

WOULD LOVE TO NETWORK

Started by Carl Vigliarolo in Classifieds - Help Wanted 19 hours ago.

Amy Stark

Do you have a story about R L Stevens? 5 Replies

Started by Amy Stark in Classifieds - Help Wanted. Last reply by Amy Stark 22 hours ago.

Pat Coyle

Iranian Governement Shuts Down Internet, but how? Why? 2 Replies

Started by Pat Coyle in Politics. Last reply by Marita Topmiller 1 day ago.

Will Hardison

New Client Needs Help With Logo Decision 24 Replies

Started by Will Hardison in Questions and Answers. Last reply by Marita Topmiller 1 day ago.

About

Pat Coyle Pat Coyle created this Ning Network.

Help

A few things to consider before joining Smaller Indiana:
1. Please use your real name (first and last) when you sign up, or we cannot open your account

2. Please do not use logos or commercial images for your profile photo

3. Events should be posted in the events calendar

4. You can post pretty much anything you want on your own personal page (self promotion, etc), and you can change the style of your personal profile page to reflect your corporate identification if you so choose.

5. Please keep all comments civil and polite. It's OK to feel strongly about a subject, and it's OK to be critical of ideas, but please refrain from personal attacks of any kind.

If you witness or experience any issues, please contact admin@smallerindiana.com and we will look into the matter.

6. Smaller Indiana is supported by its members, and by corporate sponsors. If you're interested in learning more about sponsorship, please call Pat Coyle at 317 332 7878.

© 2009   Created by Pat Coyle

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service